Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine ...

Customs

September 13, 2012

Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine or penalty, there can be no presumption that he has passed on this incidence to any other person - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine ...

Customs

September 13, 2012

You may also like:

Undervaluation of goods - Mutuality of interest - interconnected undertaking - Burden of proof - Mere allegation that there was mutuality of interest remained unproved...

Scope of SCN - Presumption with regards to documents seized - In view of Section 36A of Central Excise Act, 1944 it is only when such document is tendered in evidence...

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Redemption fine and penalty - import of medical equipment claiming the benefit of Notification 64/88-Cus dated 01/03/1998 - conditions of the notification not fulfilled...

Dishonor of Cheque - standard of proof for rebuttal presumption - The accused has discharged the burden under Section 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act...

Smuggling - foreign origin Gold - burden to prove - The tribunal clarified that the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962, solely rested on the...

Smuggled goods - Burden of proof - Revenue cannot first show laxity in investigation and then seek to shift the burden to prove that the goods are not smuggled - AT

CIRP - company under liquidation - Fraudulent transaction - Sale Deed executed by the Corporate Debtor in favour of the Respondent, with regard to the immovable property...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Refund claim - pre-deposit - As soon as the order appropriating such fine was set aside, they became eligible to refund of the deposits made during the investigations -...

Quick Updates: