Imposition of penalty u/r 15 of the CCR, 2004 read with Section ...

Appellant avoids penalty u/r 15, CCR 2004, and Section 78, FA 1994 by paying tax and interest pre-notice.

April 25, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 15 of the CCR, 2004 read with Section 78 of the FA, 1994 - after being pointed out by the CERA Audit, the appellant went through its records and finally did not dispute and paid the entire amount of tax along with applicable interest before issuance of the Show Cause Notice - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/r 15 of the CCR, 2004 read with Section ...

Appellant avoids penalty u/r 15, CCR 2004, and Section 78, FA 1994 by paying tax and interest pre-notice.

April 25, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - the appellant paid the service tax and interest for the period from 18.04.2006 onwards before issuance of show cause notice therefore, the...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Imposition of penalty u/r 15(2) of CCR, 2004 - CENVAT Credit - No evidence of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts which are essential conditions...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

Validity of show cause notice - extended period of limitation - Whether the ingredients for resort to proviso to section 73(1) of FA, 1994 are present to obviate the...

The appellant was liable to pay service tax on banking and financial services, but their failure to do so was not willful or deliberate. The non-disclosure of certain...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - services received from abroad, but service tax not paid - even if the appellant pays service tax, they would be eligible for the credit...

Penalty - instead of issuing the show cause notice for recovery of the 15% amount of penalty, the department had proceeded against the appellant for confirmation of the...

The court held that the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not be invoked against the appellant as there was no...

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though...

The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement to a reduced penalty under the second proviso to Section 78(1) of the Finance Act 1994. The appellant had not...

Whether the Appellant is liable to pay interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994? - The Appellant prior to the issue of show cause notice, on being pointed by...

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Requirement of pre-deposit towards compliance with proviso to Section 43 (5) of RERA - liability of Appellant to pay interest is not in praesenti but in future -...

Quick Updates: