Assessment in the name of merged company - MAPL had been merged ...

VAT and Sales Tax

August 4, 2020

Assessment in the name of merged company - MAPL had been merged with the petitioner, MEPL - the 1st respondent, who is the Assessing Officer of the MAPL, ought to have dropped further proceedings since the assessee was no longer in existence. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessment in the name of merged company - MAPL had been merged ...

VAT and Sales Tax

August 4, 2020

You may also like:

Notice u/s 148 – Notice was issued in the name of amalgamating company which has been merged - the amalgamating company ceased to exist - Notice invalid - AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

Assessment after merger of company - scope of section 170 - No separate notice issued for the amalgamated company - for reopening of assessment proceedings in respect of...

Validity of reassessment order made in the name of defunct company which has since merged with the petitioner - it would be absurd to hold that the order has been passed...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Once a query has been raised by Assessing Officer through the assessment proceeding and the assessee has responded to that query, it...

'Assessment of Firms'-some of the important issues to be kept under consideration by the Assessing Officers while framing assessment

Reopening of assessment - if the Assessing Officer is to reopen the finding rendered in the scrutiny assessment, then it would clearly amount to change of opinion, which...

Scope of limited scrutiny - Assessing Officers should abide by the instructions of CBDT while completing limited scrutiny assessments and should be scrupulous about...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Quick Updates: