Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2020 Year 2020 This

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT, has not dealt with this specific ...

Income Tax

October 10, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT, has not dealt with this specific objection, but, would fault the assessing officer for not invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) merely on the ground that the market value was higher. As point out earlier, the guideline value is only an indicator and that will always not represent the fair market value of the property and therefore, the invocation of the power under Section 263 by the PCIT is not sustainable in law. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - applicability of provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - purchase of shops on less than stamp valuation - record clearly reveal that the AO has...

  2. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - valuation of land purchased by assessee - deemed gift under section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - Assessee submitted that, actual deed could not be...

  3. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - FMV of property - The events subsequent to the transaction of “transfer” of the immovable property under consideration will have no...

  4. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Applicability of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) has to be considered by reading the provision as a whole and in the context of various exceptions...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

  6. Revision u/s 263 - provision of s.56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) was applicable - market value of the subject property vs stamp value - the stated sale consideration is not the...

  7. Addition invoking the provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - just because the said colony or flat is adjacent to a road, which has a higher guideline value, the...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

  9. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The fact remains that the specific issue mentioned and has been examined and the contention of the assessee accepted by the Assessing Officer....

  10. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - In this case, the Assessing Officer has not found any specific fault in rejecting or not satisfying with the valuation made by the assessee....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates