Levy of Penalty - retracted statement - the admissibility of the ...

Customs

January 29, 2021

Levy of Penalty - retracted statement - the admissibility of the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Act from the appellant on 11.03.1998, was considered by the Tribunal and it was held that the said statement is admissible and the belated retraction was rightly rejected by the Adjudicating Authority. Furthermore, the Tribunal found, on facts, that the role of the appellant has been clearly brought out by the fact that the appellant was present in the godown, at the time of search, when the officers detected the concealment of the sandalwood along with the Mangalore Roofing Tiles. - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty - retracted statement - the admissibility of the ...

Customs

January 29, 2021

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 112 of CA - Smuggling - Gold - The case of Revenue against these appellants have made out on the basis of their statements recorded at the time of...

Personal penalty on the charge of forgery of Textile Committee report - It is found that forgery is a very serious charge which should be proved by clear and cogent...

Confiscation of the gold bars - remelted gold of foreign origin or not - The admissibility and weight of retracted statements - The Tribunal found that the appellants...

Assessment us 153A - Statement of assessee alone cannot be the basis for making any estimated additions against the assessee. May be the assessee has retracted from the...

Estimation of income - Bogus purchases - Reliance on retracted statement - The ITAT, after reviewing the case, noted discrepancies in the reliance on these statements...

Seeking grant of bail - Reliability of retracted statements - In the present case as well, the question is not regarding the admissibility but the reliability. The...

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - non filing / delayed filing of e-TDS statement - e-TDS statements were submitted on 8.2.2013 and 9.2.2013 for the Assessment Year 2008-09 - it...

Addition based on retracted statement recorded on oath u/s 132(4)/133A - Statement taken even u/s 132(4) of the Act cannot be used as conclusive evidence if it is not...

Penalty levied by the AO u/s. 271AAB r.w.s. 274 - levy penalty of 30% on undisclosed income - the reasons given by the AO to levy 30% penalty on undisclosed income is...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Revocation of CHA License - forfeiture of security deposit - levy of penalty - while submitting the reply a faint attempt has been made by the appellant to retract the...

Penalty u/s 234E - delay in filling of TDS return - Contention of the AR that since the TDS statement pertains to the period i.e for the financial year 2013-14(1st...

Levy of penalty - there is change in opinion and basis for levy of penalty for concealment varies - there is no merit in levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the...

Assessee retracting and giving proper explanation for investment, after two months - Statement made at odd hours cannot be considered as voluntary statement.

Quick Updates: