Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2021 Year 2021 This

Addition u/s 68 - share premium money - the assessee has ...


Assessee clears burden u/s 68; lack of cross-examination leads to deletion of additions.

January 29, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 - share premium money - the assessee has discharged the onus cast upon it by filing the necessary documents before the AO as well as CIT(A). Moreover in absence of cross examination of the persons whose statements were relied by the AO, the addition can not be made in view of the fact that specific prayers to the AO to this effect were made before the AO. - Additions to be deleted - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal...

  2. The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating...

  3. Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - bank account can’t be loosely called as books of account u/s 68 - ITAT can’t covert the addition from section 68 to section...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, regarding the addition u/s 68, it was found that the investors' transactions were genuine, evidenced by banking...

  5. The ITAT upheld the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding unsecured loans and share capital. Despite the Assessee's claims of secured loans from...

  6. The ITAT Mumbai held that the burden of proof regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of loan creditors lies with the assessee. Once the assessee...

  7. ITAT upheld deletion of addition under section 68 regarding unexplained share application money and premium. Assessee established initial burden of proof through banking...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  9. Assessee challenged addition on account of unproved sundry creditors u/s 41(1), contending evidence of liability cessation was provided. AO held assessee failed to prove...

  10. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the assessee company. The assessee had furnished all relevant documents and evidence to...

  11. Addition u/s 68 - addition of the cash deposits in the assessee’s savings bank account - as the bank account of an assessee cannot be held to be the 'books' of an...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  13. Reopening assessment u/s 148 upheld based on specific information from DDIT (Inv) about transactions with M/s Vishnu Trading Co, providing reasonable belief of escaped...

  14. The ITAT ruled on the addition u/s 68 of share capital/premium from three dummy entities related to RPS Group. The addition was substantive for RPS Group and protective...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - depositor is one of the directors of the company - To discharge the burden which Section 68 casts upon the assessee, at least some plausible...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates