Miscellaneous application maintainability as filed beyond the ...

Late Miscellaneous Applications u/s 254(2) of Income Tax Act Are Not Acceptable Due to No Delay Condonation Provision.

February 3, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Miscellaneous application maintainability as filed beyond the limitation period as provided u/s 254(2) - where there is no provision for condonation of delay for filing of the miscellaneous application, then the miscellaneous application filed belatedly is not maintainable being barred by limitation provided under section 254(2) of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Miscellaneous application maintainability as filed beyond the ...

Late Miscellaneous Applications u/s 254(2) of Income Tax Act Are Not Acceptable Due to No Delay Condonation Provision.

February 3, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Condonation of delay - Application for rectification of mistake - when there is no provision of condonation of delay for filing of the Miscellaneous Application then the...

Rectification of mistake - when there is no provision for condonation of delay for filing of the miscellaneous application, then the miscellaneous application filed...

Condonation of delay for filing of the Miscellaneous Application - Miscellaneous Application filed belatedly due to late response from the DRP - when there is no...

Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

ITAT rejected Revenue's application for rectification under Section 254(2). The Tribunal determined that the application was essentially a disguised attempt to review...

HC set aside ITAT's rectification order under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, finding ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing income classification. The dispute...

The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF...

Rectification u/s 254(2) - one of ground was not disposed - since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has already been admitted and a substantial question of...

The High Court rejected the application for condonation of delay u/s 119 (2) (b) in filing income tax returns u/s 139 (1) or 139 (4) for AY 2022-23. The petitioner's...

Exemption u/s 11 - Application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B u/s 119(2)(b) rejected - the provisions under Section 119(2)(b) has been enacted with a...

Application for condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) - condonation of delay in filing returns and claiming refund - Section 119(2)(b) does not impose any limitation for...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Registration u/s 12A - Rejection of petitioner's application u/s 119(2)(b) for delay in filing audit report in Form-10B. Held that petitioners are entitled to succeed....

Jurisdiction - proper authority to sign the application - In the instant case, the appeal was filed within time and there was only delay in rectification of defect...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court - When the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review the order passed by them,...

Quick Updates: