Unexplained investment u/s. 69 - DDIT (Inv.) could not have ...

Valuation Officer Misses Deadline for Building Valuation Report u/s 142A(6); CIT(A) Rules Against Income Tax Department.

February 12, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Unexplained investment u/s. 69 - DDIT (Inv.) could not have referred the question of cost of construction/valuation of the assessee’s building to the Valuation Officer in the year 2014 ; and thereafter, since the DVO did not present the valuation report after AO has referred the valuation vide letter dated 22.01.2016 as well as the Ld. CIT(A) within six months from the end of the month of the reference, the Ld. CIT(A) rightly held that DVO was bound by law [sec. 142A(6)] to have submitted the valuation report within the statutory time limit, which view we endorse.- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unexplained investment u/s. 69 - DDIT (Inv.) could not have ...

Valuation Officer Misses Deadline for Building Valuation Report u/s 142A(6); CIT(A) Rules Against Income Tax Department.

February 12, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee objected to the valuation report prepared by the district valuation officer and the stamp duty rate. The assessing officer referred the matter to the...

The ITAT considered whether an assessing officer can refer to a registered valuer u/s 55A based on physical appearance during search/survey without rejecting books of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - difference pointed out by the DVO in his valuation report - There should be a live link between the material coming to the notice of...

Estimation of value of assets by the Valuation Officer - if the petitioner has any objection to the Valuation Report, he can again raise an objection to the Valuation...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to compute the assessee's income by adding the difference in valuation of shares u/s 56(2)(viib)....

Revision u/s 263 based on DVO's report received after assessment culmination was invalid as per section 142A(4), DVO failed to provide opportunity of being heard to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that when the valuation officer fails to submit the valuation report within a reasonable time, the assessing officer cannot...

Investment in purchase of property - addition on basis of valuation report of DVO u/s 142A - The provisions of section 142A of the Act are applicable only when the...

Estimation of cost of extraction of ore - AO gravely erred in relying upon the valuation report submitted by a Registered Valuer while assessing the income of the...

ITAT allowed the appeal and remanded the case for reassessment. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the assessment order, specifically noting that the...

This circular issued by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) introduces a Valuation Report Identification Number (VRIN) system for valuation reports...

Depreciation on Buildings - Adoption of WDV based on a valuation report prepared for a different purpose - Sec.32 of the Act mandates depreciation to be allowed as...

Determination of value u/s 50C - Validity of order of CIT(A) directing the AO to recalculate the capital gain on sale of land taking total value of property of Rs. 6.05...

Capital gain computation - Jantri rates v/s DVO’s report - Tribunal has rightly observed that once valid reference to the valuation officer is made under section...

Quick Updates: