Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2021 Year 2021 This

Penalty levied u/s 271D - accepting unsecured loan above ₹ ...


Penalty Imposed for Violating Section 269SS: Unsecured Loan Over Rs. 20,000 Not Justified by NEFT Speed, No Section 273B Immunity Granted.

February 19, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty levied u/s 271D - accepting unsecured loan above ₹ 20,000/- violating provisions of section 269SS - In the present times the bank transfers are quick through National Electronic Funds Transfer (In short ‘NEFT’) which hardly takes a day to transfer the amount. - Assessee do not deserve any immunity from paying the penalty u/s 271D of the Act by taking the shield/cover of Section 273B of the Act claiming it to be a reasonable cause for the said failure. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

  2. CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

  3. The ITAT held: Interest expenditure on unsecured loans is allowable deduction u/s 57(iii) as borrowed funds were utilized for advancing loans earning interest income,...

  4. Court set aside auction sale on equitable grounds as entire amount due was deposited by respondents. Appellant deprived of using Rs.81,20,000 from 21.07.2019 till...

  5. The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

  6. The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

  7. Addition u/s 68 - Unsecured Loans - onus to proof - Assessee had also paid interest on the unsecured loan after deducting TDS @20% which reveals that during subsequent...

  8. SC upheld the Tribunal's compensation award in a motor accident death claim, restoring Rs. 58,24,000/- for father and Rs. 93,61,000/- for mother against claimed amounts...

  9. Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

  10. The AT found evidence of hawala transactions through a recovered notebook containing daily business accounts, despite the appellant's retraction. The tribunal...

  11. Penalty imposed u/s 271A - Failure to maintain books of accounts - no income from business or profession received by the assessee which exceeds Rs.1,20,000/-. Therefore,...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abetment in undervaluation - evasion of Customs Duty by several syndicates of crane...

  13. The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

  14. The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

  15. Penalty for cash loan/ transactions against primary co-operatives - Section 269SS / 269T - Relief given to Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (“PACS”) and Primary...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates