Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was ...

Central Excise

October 4, 2012

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was ...

Central Excise

October 4, 2012

You may also like:

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Refund claim rejected as time bar - The original authority and the lower appellate authority being creatures of the statute, prima facie are required to follow the...

Rebate/refund claim - export of services - Since the appellant has failed to exercise the doctrine of reasonable time with respect to remaining two claims, those have...

Claim of refund - Interest on delayed refund - limitation bar - Section 11BB - Price variation clause - the claim is hopelessly time barred. - AT

Rebate / refund claim on export of goods - non-realization of foreign exchange - exporter has not submitted (BRCs) in respect of export clearances, even after lapse of...

Rejection of rebate claim on ATF supplied to foreign going Aircraft - refund claim was rejected on procedural infractions, which are condonable. - HC

Refund claim - Notification No.17/2009 - it is clear that receipt submitted by the courier agency does not content the details as required under the notification -...

Refund claim - whether the refund of rebate of the tax paid on input services is to be allowed to respondent or otherwise? - In the absence of any time limit in the...

Rebate of Excise Duty and sugar cess paid - When the export is not disputed by the revenue, the rebate claim cannot be rejected on the ground of procedural infractions -...

Refund claim - service tax paid under mistake of law - time limitation - Assessee's claim to refund would not be disallowed solely because it seemed barred by limitation.

Quick Updates: