Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide ...

Income Tax

April 9, 2021

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be cancelled if there are materials to suggest on conclusion of the proceedings before the Assessing Officer; that the Assessing Officer was, on the whole, satisfied with the overall compliances made by the assessee during proceedings before the Assessing Officer - Penalty deleted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide ...

Income Tax

April 9, 2021

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrender was not voluntary - assessee failed to explain the difference between the assessed income and returned income - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) and / or 272A(1)(d) - assessee failed to comply notice under Section 142(1) - The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not under...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Quick Updates: