Ex-parte order u/s 144 - notices issued during the year 2014 ...

Ex-parte order u/s 144 for non-compliance since 2014; CIT(A) remands for further review by AO.

April 12, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Ex-parte order u/s 144 - notices issued during the year 2014 onwards have remained uncomplied with and the assessment was thereafter completed u/s 144 - CIT(A) admitted the additional grounds and restored the matter before the AO - these additional evidences have been sent to the Assessing Officer for necessary examination and therefore, as far as Revenue’s interest is concerned, the same has been duly safe-guarded by way of providing the reasonable opportunity to the AO. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Ex-parte order u/s 144 - notices issued during the year 2014 ...

Ex-parte order u/s 144 for non-compliance since 2014; CIT(A) remands for further review by AO.

April 12, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Non compliance of assessee v/s Non compliance of AO - Can assessee take advantage of his own non compliance -...

SC remanded the matter to HC, directing expedited review of an ex-parte assessment reopening order. The court mandated HC to adjudicate the pending review petition...

Reassessment order u/s 147 - the AO does not enjoy the power of review. Therefore in the present case it is clear that the action of the present AO tantamount to review...

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of statutory notices - since the order was passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) and not 144 means the subsequent compliance in the...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

Review of order - Levy of penalty - grounds for review are that the imposition of penalty by the authorities is not automatic and the same can be imposed only when there...

National Financial Reporting Authority Amendment Rules, 2022 - Punishment in case of non-compliance - Notification

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Non-compliance of pre-deposit order - dismissing the appeal for non compliance of the predeposit order cannot be faulted - HC

Quick Updates: