Reopening of assessment - Recovery of Refund of Extra Duty ...

Court Rules Against Premature EDD Recovery Order; Respondents Should Have Awaited CESTAT Appeal Outcome.

July 9, 2021

Case Laws Customs HC

Reopening of assessment - Recovery of Refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) - this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order issued on 08.01.2013 ought not to have issued by the respondents and they should have waited till the disposal of the CESTAT Appeal filed by the petitioner, which is pending. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - Recovery of Refund of Extra Duty ...

Court Rules Against Premature EDD Recovery Order; Respondents Should Have Awaited CESTAT Appeal Outcome.

July 9, 2021

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The AAR ruled that recoveries from employees for canteen and transportation services are taxable under GST laws. Transportation services fall under SAC 9964, taxable at...

The petitioner, an end user of PVC Suspension Resins, challenged the ongoing anti-dumping duty investigation initiated by the respondent authority. The court dismissed...

HC affirmed that blocking under Rule 86A of Orissa GST Rules serves as revenue security by preventing utilization of future ITC through negative balance insertion in...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

State Government permissibility to enact Rule 5 of the Rules for recovery of the amount as arrears of land revenue - Madhya Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprises...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Disallowance of credit cannot rest upon statements but must stand the test of definition of ‘input service’ in rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on facts which is...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Settlement in a cheque dishonor case u/s 138 NI Act recorded by the court after satisfying its voluntariness is legally binding. Upon breach, the court must initiate...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

The issue pertains to the taxability of notice pay or amounts recovered by employers from employees upon premature resignation. The department contended that such...

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

Duty drawback - recovery of erroneously sanctioned claim under Rule 16 of Drawback Rules where no time limit is prescribed - recovery proceedings are valid - CGOVT

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - when there was no recovery mechanism before 01.03.2013, therefore, no recovery can be affected and accordingly the present proceedings...

Quick Updates: