Addition u/s.69 or 68 - assessee has paid on-money towards ...

Court Rules Addition for Unexplained Investment Should Apply Only to Assessee's One-Third Property Share, Not One-Half Share.

August 6, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s.69 or 68 - assessee has paid on-money towards purchase of property to the seller - The assessee is only owner of 1/3rd share in the property purchased. - Any addition that could be made in the hands of the assessee on account of unexplained investment made on purchase of property could only be to the extent of 1/3rd share and not 1/2 share as made by the Revenue in the instant case - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s.69 or 68 - assessee has paid on-money towards ...

Court Rules Addition for Unexplained Investment Should Apply Only to Assessee's One-Third Property Share, Not One-Half Share.

August 6, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Addition u/s 69B - unexplained investment - it is evident that those three flats belonging to the M/s Starlight security LLP mentioned in the Escrow agreement has...

Deduction u/s 54F is not available to an assessee who owns more than one house property at the time of purchasing a new property. The assessee, despite jointly...

Assessee's addition of on-money paid in cash to developer for property purchase, source unexplained, was based on data from third party's search and third party's...

The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed allowing deduction for indexed cost of acquisition and exemption u/s 54B. Addition u/s 68 for unexplained...

Unexplained investment - The basis of addition made in the present case is the source of investment remaining unexplained. Now, the assessee having explained the source...

Capital gain in respect of sale of only one property - addition u/s 50C - assessee itself had leasehold rights in the said property and hence in instant facts, the...

The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

Unexplained money u/s 69A or investment u/s 69 - Once an AO finds that an investment has been made, he has to examine the Assessee's explanation as to the source of that...

Assessment u/s 153A - Unexplained investment in hotel construction rejected as the material found during search pertained to another person, not the assessee. CIT(A) had...

ITAT examined three key issues regarding property transactions and unexplained funds. On unexplained money under s.69A, the Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of AO's...

The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s addition under s.69 regarding unexplained property investment, accepting loan from assessee's mother as legitimate source after verification of...

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

ITAT upheld multiple findings from CIT(A), predominantly favoring the assessee across various contested issues. Key determinations include deletion of additions under...

Quick Updates: