Addition u/s 68 - mistake of introduction of authorized capital ...

Tax Practitioner Error Corrected: Assessing Officer to Remove Unauthorized Capital Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act.

August 9, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 68 - mistake of introduction of authorized capital - tax practitioner had made the above inadvertent mistake while filing the return of income which is not the real capital and investment of the assessee. Therefore, we direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under section 68 of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - mistake of introduction of authorized capital ...

Tax Practitioner Error Corrected: Assessing Officer to Remove Unauthorized Capital Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act.

August 9, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid where the Assessing Officer had previously examined the claim for deduction of foreign exchange...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of the reassessment notice issued u/s 148 and the consequent order passed u/s 147 regarding the addition made by the...

Correct head of income - Business Income or capital gain - assessee decided to sale the agriculture land, due to compulsion, hence assessee cannot be treated as a trader...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Refund of excess tax paid - The Assessing Officer committed a serious error in providing for adjustment of the excess tax against the demands for the later years. - The...

Validity of assessment order - Since, the levy of tax under the Act on the sale of goods during the course of import was an error apparent on the face of the record, the...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had alleged...

Impugned order set aside, matter remitted back to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Assessing Officer rejected claim based on Tax Audit Report not being duly...

Assessment u/s 147 versus 153C - choice of correct course of assessment. The assessee's name featured in the list of beneficiaries of accommodation entries by way of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that when the valuation officer fails to submit the valuation report within a reasonable time, the assessing officer cannot...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Disallowance of provision for ex-gratia - CIT(A) has provided an opportunity to the assessing officer to examine the mistake committed...

This case pertains to the validity of an order passed u/s 250 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of expenditure due to a...

ITAT adjudicated a dispute regarding capital gains taxation, specifically addressing the set-off of non-grandfathered short-term and long-term capital losses against...

Quick Updates: