Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction of Income Tax ...

ACIT's Assessment Invalid: Lacked Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Failed to Issue Mandatory Section 148 Notice for Reassessment.

August 18, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction of Income Tax Authorities - Power to transfer cases - the assessment framed by ACIT, Circle-23(1), Hooghly, is bad in law on two counts, firstly he did not have any pecuniary jurisdiction to frame the assessment and secondly he himself did not form any belief that the income of the assessee has escaped assessment nor did he issue notice u/s 148 of the Act which was sine qua non to assume jurisdiction to frame to assessment. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction of Income Tax ...

ACIT's Assessment Invalid: Lacked Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Failed to Issue Mandatory Section 148 Notice for Reassessment.

August 18, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the issue of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act had been thoroughly examined during the original...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Jurisdiction of income tax authorities - Transfer of case u/s 127 - No document has been produced on the file by the Department to show that the case was transferred by...

Scrutiny assessment - validity of notice issued u/s.143(2) - jurisdiction of AO - Transfer of case - the ACIT(OSD), Range-2, Bhubaneswar could not have jurisdiction to...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Lack of jurisdiction of AO in issuing notice u/s.143 (2) - Change of residential address of the assessee - The Appellate Tribunal admitted the additional ground raised...

AO's jurisdiction was challenged regarding notice u/s 143(2) after territorial reassignment. ITAT determined that jurisdictional challenges fall under Part B, Chapter...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO jurisdiction in issuing notice - Once the territorial jurisdiction of respondent no.1 is admitted by the petitioner, there existed...

ITAT ruled the assessment order invalid due to procedural deficiencies and lack of proper jurisdiction. The AO failed to issue mandatory notice under Section 143(2)...

The HC quashed the notice issued u/s 143(2) by the JAO for AY 2023-24, holding that the JAO lacked jurisdiction. As per section 144B(1)(iii), for scrutiny assessment...

Quick Updates: