Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Royalty Benchmarking - assessee had adopted TNMM at the entity ...

Income Tax

September 1, 2021

Royalty Benchmarking - assessee had adopted TNMM at the entity level in which process royalty payment is considered as closely linked transaction and part of operating cost - once the net profit margin is tested on touchstone of arm's length price, it pre-supposes that the various components of income and expenditure considered in the process of arriving at the net profit are also at arm's length. - TPO has to follow a consistent approach and adopt net sales as denominator for the purpose of comparable royalty in the case of comparables and the assessee. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Most appropriate method for determining the ALP of the royalty - Transfer of intangibles - matter remitted back to the AO/TPO for determination of ALP of royalty by...

  2. As the international transactions of payment of royalty and fees for technical services are separate transactions and not closely linked with the other transactions with...

  3. TP adjustment - MAM selection - method used for benchmarking the royalty transaction - It may be true that the assessee aggregated payment of royalty with the...

  4. Transaction is approved by the RBI and Government is not sufficient and the assessee has to benchmark the royalty payment separately - Income Tax

  5. TP Adjustment - TPO rejected the ‘entity-level’ benchmarking done by assessee, instead made ‘unit-level’ comparison i.e. PLI of each unit was compared with the PLI of...

  6. TP adjustment - TPO accepted ALP based on TNMM but sought separate benchmarking of notional interest on the outstanding receivables - if the impact of extended credit...

  7. TP Adjustment - As application of TNMM method has been accepted by the Tribunal for AYs 2005-06 to 2007-08 and no change in facts or circumstances has been demonstrated...

  8. Penalty u/s 271G - under TNMM adopted by the assessee, the profit of the international transaction has to be furnished, whereas the assessee has only furnished the...

  9. TP Adjustment - Design Engineering Services - in the TP study report assessee applied margins at the entity level - it cannot be precluded from furnishing segmental...

  10. TP Adjustment - MAM selection - once TNMM has been accepted under the similar FAR, there is no reason to deviate by adopting CUP Method and other methods admittedly are...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates