Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Addition on account of difference of the gross receipts shown in ...


Court Remands Case to Assessing Officer for Further Investigation on Discrepancy Between Form 26AS and ITR Gross Receipts.

September 4, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition on account of difference of the gross receipts shown in the 26AS in comparison to the ITR - Once the assessee has disputed the said amount pertaining to any of the bills raised by the assessee, then a proper enquiry ought to have been conducted by the AO to verify this fact. The assessee has expressed its inability to force the other party to rectify the TDS statement and consequently 26AS - we set aside this issue to the record of the AO for conducting a proper enquiry - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court ruled that when tax deducted at source (TDS) is not initially credited but the relevant certificate or Form 26AS is subsequently presented, the Assessing...

  2. Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for...

  3. Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST discrepancies, failing to avail opportunity of personal hearing. Court held that notice was issued by respondent based...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of the reassessment notice issued u/s 148 and the consequent order passed u/s 147 regarding the addition made by the...

  5. The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited...

  6. Validity of order u/s 144C - Failure to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - This Court is of the view that till the Income Tax Department ensures that the...

  7. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

  8. The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

  9. It is true that the Assessing Officer had relied heavily on the investigation carried out by the investigation wing and the material collected during such process, which...

  10. The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

  11. Validity of order passed u/s 144B - disregarding the stay granted by this court - In the assessment order, the Assessing Officer is referring to a letter stating that...

  12. HC determined CCI's jurisdiction to initiate investigation under Section 26(1) of Competition Act, 2002 requires establishing a prima facie case of anti-competitive...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - As examined the belief of the Assessing Officer to a limited extent to look into whether there was sufficient or any tangible materials...

  14. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment u/s 147 merely based on a change of opinion. The assessee had fully and truly disclosed all...

  15. Assessment proceedings were pending when registration u/s 12A was granted on 22/02/2016. The assessee had filed income tax return in ITR-7 instead of ITR-5. The issue...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates