Refund of amount appropriated during the pendency of appeal ...

Appellant's Refund Claim Denied for Exceeding One-Year Deadline Under Explanation (B) to Section 11B, Central Excise Act 1944.

September 7, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund of amount appropriated during the pendency of appeal before the CESTAT - any claims made as a consequence of Appellate Order/(s) will have to pass through the rigours of (ec) ibid. - The application for refund here is filed on 14.08.2020, which is clearly after the prescribed period of one year from the relevant date as prescribed under (ec) of Explanation (B) to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and hence, the appellant does not pass through the rigours of the specific provision under (ec) ibid - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of amount appropriated during the pendency of appeal ...

Appellant's Refund Claim Denied for Exceeding One-Year Deadline Under Explanation (B) to Section 11B, Central Excise Act 1944.

September 7, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of service tax paid - Period of limitation - As the refund claim has been filed within one year from the date of the adjudication order wherein it has been held...

Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act,...

Conviction u/ss 420, 467, 468, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner worked as Appraiser in Customs office....

Refund of service tax - booking of flat cancelled - Time Limitation - There are no doubt the service tax was deposited by the appellant on 4th October, 2016 and 24...

Refund of claim - Claim filed beyond period of 1 year - Export - Notification No. 17/2009 - all conditions are mandatory - refund claim filed beyond one year rejected - AT

Rejection of refund claim - eligible exemption - In the facts of the present case, there are no clear averments made by the appellant that conditions prescribed under...

Claim of refund - Period of limitation - the refund was filed by the appellant on 27.10.2016 and Notification reducing the rate of ADD was issued on 29.01.2016. Firstly,...

The CESTAT held that the one-year period for filing a refund claim u/r 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, for exports made on a quarterly basis, commences from the end...

Time limitation rejected as appellant filed protest through letter despite not endorsing 'Under Protest' on Bills of Entry and TR-6 Challans. Appellant, a Customs...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - surrender of registration - the appellant is entitled for refund claim of unutilized cenvat credit lying in their cenvat credit...

Refund claim - rejected on the ground that the appellant cannot claim the refund directly without challenging the assessment order (bill of entry) - refund cannot be denied - AT

Refund - non-supply of documents/ information by the appellant to the Revenue to ascertain appellant’s eligibility to refund claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit...

Refund of un-utilized cenvat credit - When time limit of refund claim is one year, there is no requirement that input credit claimed as refund should correspond to...

Refund of pre-deposit - refund claim filed by the CHA is proper or otherwise - It is not the case that whether CHA is claiming the refund. Those are applications of...

Refund - the refund claim stands filed within one year of the amount paid wrongly, supporting documents were filed beyond the period of one year does not make the refund...

Quick Updates: