Validity of Search proceedings - Both the petitioners have ...

Court Upholds Search Validity; Petitioners' Admission Justifies Action u/s 132(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

October 4, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of Search proceedings - Both the petitioners have admitted in their respective writ petitions that they in fact did not file ITRs for certain AYs. Even this information, if available with the Department would have been sufficient for them to form a reason to believe for the purpose of Section 132(1)(c). In other words, it is not mandatory that in the present case there should have been summons under Section 131 of the Act for the Department to proceed to initiate action under Section 132 of the Act. - No relief granted to petitioner - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Search proceedings - Both the petitioners have ...

Court Upholds Search Validity; Petitioners' Admission Justifies Action u/s 132(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.

October 4, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court upheld the validity of the search action u/s 132 carried out at the residential and office premises of the petitioner, an advocate. The court found the...

Validity of Search and seizure action - The Court can examine whether the reasons to believe have a rational connection or are relevant bearing to the formation of such...

Validity of search and seizure u/s 132 - The Bombay High Court quashed the search and seizure actions conducted by the Income Tax Department u/s 132 of the Income Tax...

alidity of search u/s 132 - law was amended by insertion of aforesaid Explanation by the Parliament in section 132 by the Finance Act, 2017 w.r.e.f. 1.4.1962 and it was...

The court examined the validity of search and seizure u/s 132, focusing on the scope of Revenue's power and the "reasons to believe" requirement. It held that the...

Assessment u/s 153A - pre-condition justifying the invocation of the power of search u/s 132 (1) against the Petitioner - The Respondent's search of the Petitioner was a...

Legality of search and seizure conducted at the residential premises of the petitioner - The High Court meticulously analyzed the legislative intent and statutory...

Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) - post search assessment - in the case on hand the pending reassessment proceedings u/s 147 got abated by...

Petitioner sought regular bail in case involving alleged wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed using fictitious invoices from non-existent/suspicious firms. As per...

The HC granted bail to the applicant charged under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(1)(i) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, primarily on grounds of...

Validity of Search proceedings - whether no action could have been initiated u/s 132(3) without there being any action initiated u/s 132 - no tax demand was pending -...

Validity of search u/s 132 - place of search - the search conducted in the premises in which the assessee may not be carrying on the business would not nullify the...

The High Court granted bail to the applicant u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) read with Section 132(1)(i) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The case involved the...

Assessment u/s 143(3) - search and seizure action U/s 132 was taken during pendency of assessment proceedings - proceedings initiated U/s 143(3) stood abated by virtue...

Warrant of authorisation u/s 132 - Validity of search proceedings u/s 132(1) - In the absence of existence of any of the three circumstances envisaged u/s 132(1), the...

Quick Updates: