Refund of amount illegally collected from the petitioner - ...

Court Orders Review of Refund Applications u/s 74(5) CGST Act; Dismisses Voluntary Payment Defense as Untenable.

November 2, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

Refund of amount illegally collected from the petitioner - Self-ascertainment under Section 74(5) of CGST Act - Amount paid under coercion - Right of Bona fide Tax Payer to be treated with dignity - The stand of the respondents is ambiguous as self-ascertainment is put forward only as defence to the assertion of the petitioner that the payment of amount has been made involuntarily - the contention of payment being made by way of self-ascertainment is liable to be rejected. - Lapse of time and lack of conclusion of investigation has only exacerbated the situation conferring upon the petitioners a right to seek for refund of the amount. - The refund applications at Annexure-'Q' are to be considered and suitable orders be passed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of amount illegally collected from the petitioner - ...

Court Orders Review of Refund Applications u/s 74(5) CGST Act; Dismisses Voluntary Payment Defense as Untenable.

November 2, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

HC allowed the petition challenging the refund claim rejection. The court found that the respondent improperly rejected the refund application in GST RFD-03 by stating...

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018 on 17.09.2018, and subsequently filed a fresh refund application...

Provisional orders of attachment issued u/s 83 can be challenged by filing objection u/r 159(5). Petitioner did not file objection. Respondents issued fresh provisional...

The High Court held that the petitioner's contention of not having the power to recover amounts during the pendency of an investigation that commenced prior to the...

Central Government notifies special procedure for rectification of orders issued u/ss 73, 74, 107, 108 confirming demand for wrong availment of input tax credit....

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Entitlement to interest on IGST refund - In refund application petitioner has only claimed the integrated tax and not the interest on the same - The High court referred...

Seeking to allow petitioner to adjust the credit amount which was blocked - Demand u/s 74(5) - in the notice dated 01.11.2021, it is wrongly mentioned as Form GST...

HC determined that payments made under CGST Act were coerced, not voluntary self-ascertainment under Section 74(5). Evidence showed statements were recorded and deposits...

Contempt application preferred by the appellant alleging non-compliance of order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court - entitlement to refund of the...

The appeal challenged the maintainability of an application filed u/s 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code seeking refund of an amount deposited as part of a...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

Quick Updates: