Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of ...

Assessment Invalid: Improper Notice Service u/ss 147 & 148 of Income Tax Act. Revenue Failed to Serve Correct Address.

November 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the Ld.CIT(A) that the notices served through Speed Post and affixture were at the address as per PAN Database and, therefore, tantamounted to valid service, is of no assistance to the Revenue since admittedly the PAN Database also contains the residential address of the assessee and no attempt at all was made by the Revenue to service the notice at the residential address when the notice could not be served at the office address. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of ...

Assessment Invalid: Improper Notice Service u/ss 147 & 148 of Income Tax Act. Revenue Failed to Serve Correct Address.

November 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Time limit for notice - there is no document made available to prove that the notice under section 148 dated 31.03.2018 was sent for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

Provisions and requirements for reopening an assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended. It emphasizes that mere 'change of opinion' without any new...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 and 148 – Non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - here is always a requirement of issuing of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Act in a case of an...

Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) are invalid after introduction of Finance Act 2021. Scheme...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the...

The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 consequent to revision proceedings u/s 263 pending - notice u/s 148 issued during the pendency of the assessment proceedings following...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

Quick Updates: