Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs ...

Penalties Under Customs Act Sections 114(iii) & 114AA Require Proof of Criminal Abetment as Defined by IPC Section 107.

November 30, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - To constitute a criminal offence of abetment as punishable as defined under Section 107 of Indian Penal Code, 1862, there has to be an intention to instigate, to conspire or to aid/facilitate a person to do or abstain from doing something, which is a defined penal offence and that the abettor is the part of the conspiracy with an intent to draw back benefit out of the alleged offence. - For imposition of penalty under Section 114AA the information should knowingly be false. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs ...

Penalties Under Customs Act Sections 114(iii) & 114AA Require Proof of Criminal Abetment as Defined by IPC Section 107.

November 30, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged submission of false export documents. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate charges of abetment or...

Levy of penalty u/ss 114(i) and 114(iii) of the Customs Act without evidence of abetment in the export of red sanders. The appellant failed to obtain and verify the KYC...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - export of goods at highly over invoiced values - availing undue export...

Levy of penalties u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - overvaluation of export of goods for availment of higher rate of drawback - Penalty on person who partnered with...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's...

Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

CESTAT overturned penalties imposed under Customs Act sections 114(i), 114(iii), and 114AA against appellant CHA regarding alleged duty drawback fraud through overvalued...

Imposition of penalties u/s 114(iii) of the CA, 1962 - If the officers who are respondents herein had not examined the cargo are not associated with the said shipping...

Penalty u/s 114(i) on CHA - Export of "Carbon Black" - Obligation of CHA for the unauthorized loading of the container without LEO (Let Export Order) - The Tribunal...

Levy of penalties both u/s 114 and Section 114AA on both of the CB and the exporter together - The appellant was also not seen to be a part of a conspiracy to defraud...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - abetment in smuggling - It is settled law that for imposition of penalty, it is necessary to establish a positive role on...

CESTAT allowed appeals against penalties imposed under Section 114(i) of Customs Act for alleged misdeclaration of beef as frozen buffalo meat. For Appellant 1, though...

Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on...

Quick Updates: