Refund of utilized input tax credit - rejection of claim for ...

Refund Claim Rejection Requires Proper Hearing Opportunity; Telephonic and Email Exchanges Insufficient - Section 54(7) Highlights Fairness Necessity.

December 24, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

Refund of utilized input tax credit - rejection of claim for refund - When the law requires that no application for refund shall be rejected without giving the applicant an opportunity of being heard, the same cannot be substituted by telephonic conversations and exchange of e-mails. This is more so in the case of a claim for refund where no time-limit is fixed vis-à-vis rejection of claim. Under subsection (7) of section 54, a time-limit of 60 days is prescribed for making of an order allowing claim of refund; but that period of 60 days would commence from the date of receipt of the application complete in all respects without there being a corresponding provision for rejection of application not complete in all respects. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of utilized input tax credit - rejection of claim for ...

Refund Claim Rejection Requires Proper Hearing Opportunity; Telephonic and Email Exchanges Insufficient - Section 54(7) Highlights Fairness Necessity.

December 24, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Refund of unutilized input tax credit - When the law requires that no application for refund shall be rejected without giving an applicant an opportunity of being heard,...

Refund - Concessional rate of duty - In any event, merits of the refund claim of the petitioner would require a proper determination on facts and therefore, the second...

The HC dismissed an application seeking to quash a show-cause notice and adjudication order. The Court found that despite multiple hearing notices sent both by post and...

Rejection of refund claim - opportunity of hearing not provided - As per Rule 92 (3) of CGST Rules, 2017, the provision is very clear that any application for refund...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Eligibility of the petitioner to make a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2015 (SVLDRS) and the appropriation of the amount...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

HC set aside refund rejection order under GST RFD-06 concerning export transactions with IGST payment. Petitioner, a manufacturer-exporter, made zero-rated supplies...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Refund of unutilised input tax credit - officer concerned proceeded on leave on personal grounds and therefore, the matter was assigned to another officer, who was...

Refund of amount paid upon wrongful reversal of the transitioned credit - rejection of refund merely on the ground that such refund claim does not fall within the...

Refund of SAD - refund claims filed without requisite documents - Undisputedly the necessary documents which were required for filing this refund application were under...

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

Period of limitation - rejection of refund claim of Education and Senior Higher Education cess paid on paper and paper board - Rejection of refund claim upheld - AT

Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

Quick Updates: