Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure ...

Tax Deduction for Hotel Development: Section 35AD(5)(aa) Case Remanded for Reassessment Due to Approval Delays.

February 15, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure incurred for purpose of development of hotel claimed - We restore the issue to file of the Assessing Officer and direct the A.O. to examine claim of the assessee in light of arguments of the assessee that there was no fault from their side in getting approval from competent authority. In case, the Assessing Officer finds that there is a delay from competent authority side in granting approval, then the Assessing Officer is directed to allow claim of deduction u/s. 35AD of the Act, in respect of expenditure incurred for specified business - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure ...

Tax Deduction for Hotel Development: Section 35AD(5)(aa) Case Remanded for Reassessment Due to Approval Delays.

February 15, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Input tax credit - GST paid for hotel stay in case of rent free hotel accommodation provided to employees of the Applicant - ITC is not available in view of section 17(5)(g)

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

Claim of deduction u/s. 35AD by stating that the appellant did not build the hotel building - Once deduction u/s.35AD of the Act is claimed then by virtue of section...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The subject matter of the deduction in the reassessment order was the quantum of deduction but not the eligibility of the deduction and even in...

Electronic commerce operators (ECOs) required to pay tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act for specified services supplied through their platform are not required to reverse...

ITAT allowed partial relief to appellant, a railway guard, regarding TDS credit denial. While non-response to notices due to frequent travel was deemed an inadequate...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Petitioner cannot evade penalty u/s 22(5) of TNVAT Act, 2006 by paying tax after inspection but before assessment order. Rule 7(9) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 prohibits filing...

ECOs liable for tax under Sec 9(5) of WBGST Act are not required to reverse input tax credit on inputs and input services proportionately for specified services supplied...

The case pertains to recovery of arrears of tax for Assessment Years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 due to non-filing of returns. The petitioner had previously suffered...

The case involved a dispute over short collection of TDS due to lower TDS certificates with different TANs issued by deductees. The Central Processing Centre (CPC)...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

The High Court considered a case involving refund of accumulated credit due to inverted tax structure u/s 54(3) Proviso and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules. The court held that...

Application u/s 197 for issuance of a Lower Deduction of Tax Certificate - The High Court observed that, a plain reading of Rule 28-AA makes it clear that the...

Quick Updates: