Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Refund of duty paid - deposit was made out of mistake of fact - ...

Central Excise

February 28, 2022

Refund of duty paid - deposit was made out of mistake of fact - Mere payment of an amount by the assessee and acceptance by the Department would not regularize such an amount as duty if it was not actually payable and paid by mistake. - the appellate authority i.e. the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) is directed to take up the appeal and dispose of the same within a period of 2(two) months - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund of service tax paid - payment of tax due to mistake in facts or of law - period of limitation - The law with respect to the deposits being made by the assessee...

  2. Refund of excise duty paid during investigation – voluntarily payment - the department has no right to retain any amount so long as there is no confirmed duty demand...

  3. Refund - the payment made during investigation is in the nature of pre-deposit or not - It is obvious that once the appellant paid the substantial duty amount there...

  4. Interest on refund - the amount paid as supervision charges - the earlier payment of the supervision charges has been made by a mistaken notion of law - the department...

  5. Refund claim of the amount of pre- deposit - As per the cenvat credit rules, an assessee can take the cenvat credit of any duty paid on the inputs used in the...

  6. SSI exemption - Refund claim - Central excise duty paid by mistake by including non ISI submersible pumps i.e. non BIS pumps in the overall turnover - refund allowed - AT

  7. Refund of duty paid under protest – unjust enrichment is not applicable where amount deposited under protest - AT

  8. Refund of Service tax paid by mistake - amount mistakenly paid was thus a deposit or not - refund rejected observing that the appellant were registered with the...

  9. Refund claim rejected as time bared - the amount deposited by the appellant during the investigation can never be construed as a duty - it is held as deposited under...

  10. Refund of double payment of duty made - appellant paid duty in the name of M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries inadvertently. On realising the mistake on the same date, they...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates