Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2022 Year 2022 This

Refund of duty paid - deposit was made out of mistake of fact - ...


Appellate Authority Ordered to Resolve Duty Refund Appeal on Mistaken Deposit Within Two Months.

February 28, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Refund of duty paid - deposit was made out of mistake of fact - Mere payment of an amount by the assessee and acceptance by the Department would not regularize such an amount as duty if it was not actually payable and paid by mistake. - the appellate authority i.e. the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) is directed to take up the appeal and dispose of the same within a period of 2(two) months - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The appellate authority's order passed u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority with a...

  2. Petitioner paid IGST but respondent did not take benefit of ITC. Dispute not settled. Appellate authority to consider grievance regarding payment of penalty and interest...

  3. Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

  4. This case involves a challenge to a garnish order issued by tax authorities for recovering income tax and penalties. The High Court, considering the Supreme Court's...

  5. The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

  6. HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Petitioner claimed no awareness of notices or orders, preventing timely...

  7. Principles of Natural justice - late filing of return - intent to evade or not - it is the case of petitioner is that various aspects have not been dealt with or...

  8. Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

  9. The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided...

  10. Contempt of Court - Considering the facts and circumstances on record and the facts that the Contemnor never showed any remorse nor tendered any apology for his conduct,...

  11. The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

  12. The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

  13. HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority's rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited...

  14. Interest claim for refund of amount deposited under protest was denied as the refund applications were processed within a month of receipt, falling within the...

  15. Discrepancies between input tax credit availed by petitioner in GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Court granted partial relief by setting aside impugned order...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates