Recovery of differential duty - Levy of penalty u/s 112 and ...

Court Rules on Duty Recovery and Penalties for Crane Confiscation: Cross-Examination Essential u/s 138B.

April 21, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

Recovery of differential duty - Levy of penalty u/s 112 and section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 - Confiscation of used Cranes - Reliance on statements alone is too fragile a foundation to build a case of undervaluation; such depositions are reliable only with corroborative support. In the absence of corroboration, test of cross-examination is of essence, as mandated by section 138B of Customs Act, 1962, for relevancy.- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recovery of differential duty - Levy of penalty u/s 112 and ...

Court Rules on Duty Recovery and Penalties for Crane Confiscation: Cross-Examination Essential u/s 138B.

April 21, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

HC held that both appellants must be given opportunity to cross-examine witness Mr. B under Section 138(B) of Customs Act, addressing discriminatory treatment by CESTAT...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

HC addressed a challenge regarding natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings. Petitioners sought cross-examination rights of DRI officers following Show...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

Quick Updates: