Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up ...

Notice u/s 143(2) Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Clause D of Instruction 13/2013; Assessment Void.

May 20, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny - Since the conditions as prescribed in Clause D of para 3 of the instruction no. 13/2013 are not satisfied therefore, the Assessing Officer was not having the jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny. Accordingly, the initiation of the compulsory scrutiny proceedings by issuing the notice under section 143(2) dated 11.6.2013 is invalid and consequently the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer is vitiated as invalid in law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up ...

Notice u/s 143(2) Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Clause D of Instruction 13/2013; Assessment Void.

May 20, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment dispute regarding the validity of notice u/s 143(2). The tribunal found that the notice was issued to an incorrect/non-existing...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) by correct AO - As per CBDT instruction the scrutiny noticemust be issued by the...

Non-service of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) renders assessment proceedings void ab initio. Revenue failed to prove sending of notice by ordinary post/registered post or...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. -...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition of bogus expenditure - non-issuance of valid notice u/s 143(2) - Issuance of notice under section 143(2) of the Act prior to...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - no notice u/s 143(2) issued - It is not a mere formality but it given the jurisdiction to the A.O. to complete the assessment U/s...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - the notice u/s 143(2) was not issued by an officer having jurisdiction on the assessee and who had passed the assessment order and...

Reopening of assessment -Notice u/s 143(2) - AO given the notices u/s 143(2) to the assessee immediately to filing the return, which shows non-application of mind on the...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Absence of notice u/s 143(2) - non-issuance of notice shall not vitiate the assessment proceedings after due service of notice u/s 147 - HC

Reopening of assessment - non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - assessment could not be sustained for lack of service of statutory notice u/s 143(2) of the Act - AT

Validity of reassessment proceedings - non-issue of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - The Appellate Tribunal found that the AO had not issued the statutory notice under...

Quick Updates: