Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2022 Year 2022 This

Clandestine removal - prints out taken from the Hard Disk ...


Court Rules Single Evidence Insufficient for Duty Demands in Goods Removal Case; Requires More Than Assumptions.

May 25, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal - prints out taken from the Hard Disk recovered in the premises of the alleged secret office (claimed to be a third party premises or godown) - admissible evidence or not - It is now settled principle that cases of this nature need not be proved with mathematical precision. At the same time, a single piece of evidence cannot be accepted to encompass the whole gamut of transactions. - . Reliance on principle of preponderance of probability, no way confers a License to demand duty on the basis of assumptions/presumptions/ vague imputations - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  2. CENVAT credit on GTA servuce - Input credit - place of removal - duty paid at specified rate - In this case, the “place of removal” would be the “place of removal” for...

  3. The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

  4. 100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

  5. Demand duty - Allegation of import Portland Pozzolana Cement without payment of customs duty - No evidence for actual import of the goods - The CESTAT held that the...

  6. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  7. Clandestine Removal - Grey Fabrics - It is also found that on the one hand the Revenue has made demand of central excise duty on goods consumed in the finished goods and...

  8. Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of...

  9. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - removal of capital goods as such - power plant - Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The sale of goods or transfer of ownership of the...

  10. Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

  11. Misdeclaration of goods regarding value and quantity - goods declared as 'unbranded', but branded caps of various brands like Puma, Nike, Adidas etc. found -...

  12. CESTAT ruled that sale of capital goods within a 100% EOU to an overseas buyer without physical removal does not constitute deemed debonding requiring customs duty...

  13. CENVAT Credit - exempt goods - On merits, it is a case that the appellant is manufacturing dutiable goods not exempted goods. Some clearances were exempted from payment...

  14. The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

  15. Remission of duty on the goods lost in fire accident - The position in law is very clearly stated in Rule 49 according to which duty is chargeable only on removal of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates