Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that ...

Allegations of Profiteering Dismissed: No ITC Benefit Passed on for Pre-GST Duplex House Purchase, Section 171 Not Applicable.

June 11, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017 from the said Applicant - Launching of the project, Agreement to sell and Completion Certificate of the project had taken place in the pre-GST regime and hence, there was no post-GST tax rate or ITC structure which could be compared with the pre-GST tax rate and ITC and also the anti-profiteering provisions related to Section 171 were not in existence at that time. Accordingly, it is clear that the Respondent had neither benefited from additional ITC nor had there been a reduction in the tax rate in the post-GST period and therefore it does not qualify to be a case of profiteering. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that ...

Allegations of Profiteering Dismissed: No ITC Benefit Passed on for Pre-GST Duplex House Purchase, Section 171 Not Applicable.

June 11, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not passed on to the buyers - all the relevant events for the project “Epic” took place in GST regime and the...

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the prices - the ITC,...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

Profiteering - sale of a built up house - DGAP's Report revealed that the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover post GST period increase from 0.61% to 3.45% i.e net...

The respondent commenced a real estate project "Swastik Heights" in the post-GST regime, with commencement certificate issued on 08.03.2018 and GST registration...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit...

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project Heritage Max - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC - This benefit was...

Profiteering - supply of construction services related to purchase of Flat - the ratio of ITC in pre-GST period was higher than the post-GST period. - The allegation...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

Quick Updates: