Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2022 Year 2022 This

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - the addition made in the impugned case ...

Income Tax

July 4, 2022

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - the addition made in the impugned case on account of excess depreciation claimed, having been surrendered by the assessee itself without any prior detection by the Revenue, the excess claim having been demonstrated to have been made for bonafide reasons, it is surely not a case for levy of penalty at all. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

  2. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - the addition made in the impugned case on account of excess depreciation claimed having been...

  3. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Excess depreciation claim - it is merely a case of difference arising out of the reworking of the carry forward depreciation by the AO by...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation @100% instead of 15% - Temporary Wooden structures like interiors, glow signs etc. being Furniture & Fixture - Levy of...

  8. Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  10. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates