Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty ...

VAT and Sales Tax

July 15, 2022

Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty imposable on the dealer under Section 42(5) of the OVAT Act, particularly since it came to the conclusion that the levy of tax on the uncollected VAT amount by the dealer was not excusable and upholding the orders of the STO and the JCST in that regard. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty ...

VAT and Sales Tax

July 15, 2022

You may also like:

Tribunal has erred in law in upholding the deletion of the additions made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of the notebook and the Bank passbook - HC

Deletion of Penalty u/s 271AAA - the assessee had paid tax along with interest on undisclosed income admitted during the course of search - penalty deleted - AT

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty - Tribunal, failed to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile...

Deletion of addition of advertisement expenses – AO erred in holding that the advertisement expenses as deferred revenue expenses is not valid in the eyes of law - AT

Penalty u/s 271B - threshold limit for getting its account audited u/s 44AB - Business activity or professional activity - gross receipts were only ₹ 42 lakhs -...

ST - Whether the penalty imposable under the Finance Act, 1994 is automatic – Held no - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Penalty - whether wrong mentioning of provisions for invoking penalty would render the order illegal – Held No - tribunal is wrong in deleting the penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Quick Updates: