Addition on failure to show the “gitty’ expenses in Closing ...

Income Tax

August 3, 2022

Addition on failure to show the “gitty’ expenses in Closing Stock or WIP - addition based on audit objection - goods in transit - the AO passed the order in haste and it seems that the addition is made only for the reasons that some audit objection was raised. We also perused the alleged audit objection and find that such objection is raised without application of mind. The assumption of audit objection might be based on the idea that the office of the assessee is situated in Surat, so the material could be in transit to Surat. Though, the facts on the records were otherwise - CIT(A) rightly deleted the additions - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition on failure to show the “gitty’ expenses in Closing ...

Income Tax

August 3, 2022

You may also like:

Addition in respect of closing construction work-in-progress (WIP) - Valuation - When there is no change in number of items of inventory of construction WIP as shown in...

Addition made on account of undervaluation of closing stock - cost of job work charges have not been included - thus the closing stock of the assessee company is suppressed - AT

Undervaluation of closing stock - non inclusion of excise duty into computation - addition to the income on the ground of undervaluation of the closing stock was wrong - SC

Confirmation of notional addition – Excise duty added in the value of the closing stock of finished goods – a liability cannot be converted into an asset - AT

Difference of stock - amount of closing stock differ in the books and as per the statement given to the bankers - unaccounted fabrication work - additions confirmed - HC

Value determined by the City Civil court considered by the AO as the closing WIP acceptable - AT

Double deduction of expenses towards excise duty – effect of increase of closing stock was neutralised by debiting to the P & L account - matter remanded back for...

CIT(A) was justified in holding that the reopening of the assessment, based on the audit objection, is neither legal nor valid, and consequently, cancelling the same - AT

Reassessment - The audit objection is based upon the legal opinion expressed by them and not pointing out any factual error or omission - reopening of assessment was not valid - AT

Undervaluation of closing stock - CENVAT benefit was not available to the assessee therefore enhancement in the value of closing stock on account of CENVAT was not warranted - AT

Quick Updates: