Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2022 Year 2022 This

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director u/s 141 of ...


Directors Only Liable for Cheque Dishonor if Responsible for Company Business u/s 141 Negotiable Instruments Act.

August 22, 2022

Case Laws     Indian Laws     HC

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director u/s 141 of NI Act - The provisions under Section 141 does not make all the Directors liable for the offence. The criminal liability can be fastened only on those who, at the time of commission of the offence, were in charge of and were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. Further, the primary responsibility is on the complainant to make specific averments as are required under the provisions in the complaint so as to make the accused vicariously liable. For fastening the criminal liability, there is no presumption that every Director knows about the transaction - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Directors, who are not signatories to the cheques - the allegations in the complaint are that at the time at which the...

  2. Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which deals with vicarious liability for offenses committed by companies u/s 138 (dishonor of cheques)....

  3. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficient funds - vicarious liability of the petitioner u/s 141 of NI Act after tendering such resignation - the complainant should specifically...

  4. The law regarding the liability of a director for an offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act committed by a company is well-established. Section 141, being a...

  5. Liability of one of an independent Director of a Company under Section 141 of N.I. Act for the dishonour of the cheque issued by the original accused on behalf of the...

  6. Dishonor of cheque case. Petitioners described as managers, wives of directors. Court examined whether petitioners can be arrayed as accused. Held, company is principal...

  7. Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of an independent director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

  8. SC determined that a director who is not a signatory to a dishonored cheque cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the 1881 Act unless Section 141 requirements are...

  9. The court interpreted Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that managing directors and joint managing directors are responsible for the company's...

  10. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - A director, who was not in charge of and was not responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company at the relevant...

  11. Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of the non-executive director - This Court is convinced that the complaint does not satisfy the requirements u/s.141 of the...

  12. The petition challenged the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner u/s 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheque. The...

  13. HC ruled that a Managing Director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonored cheque that was not drawn by their...

  14. HC ruled in favor of company directors, quashing criminal proceedings under NI Act for dishonored cheques. Court determined petitioners successfully demonstrated they...

  15. HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld that a former director cannot be held criminally...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates