Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant ...

Central Excise

September 3, 2022

Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant has not provided the data and is now trying to profit from its own inaction to claim that the demand is time-barred. Therefore, the appellant had actually suppressed the information from the Department and now cannot benefit by claiming that the demand is time-barred. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant ...

Central Excise

September 3, 2022

You may also like:

Extended period of limitation - Even if extended period is held to be inapplicable then also the entire demand of Service tax will not be completely time barred - AT

Extended period of limitation - in a previous case involving the same issue, demand was dropped - Therefore, all relevant facts were within the knowledge/ notice of the...

Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct information is not a suppression of fact unless it was deliberate to stop the payment of duty - entire...

Extended period of limitation - Merely that assessee is PSU is not sufficient to set aside the SCN as being barred by time - SCN not barred by time.

Invocation of Extended period of limitation - mere inaction or failure on the part a manufacturer/ service provider is not sufficient to invoke the larger limitation of five years.

Levy of tax - imposition of penalty - time bar - In the balance sheet, the appellant is disclosed the receipt of the records payment of services - extended period of...

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Valuation - Photography services - inclusion of cost of material - Longer limitation period under proviso to Section 73 (1) would not be invokable and, as such, the...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Extended period cannot be invoked to demand service tax for mere inaction or failure or negligence on the part of the Appellant. There must be deliberate defiance of law...

Quick Updates: