Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 5, 2022

Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that the case is heard by one entity and the order is pronounced by another who has not heard the case at all. In such circumstances, the question posed is hereby answered in favour of the Appellant and it is held that the order dated 10.01.2018, having been passed by a bench in which one of the member was not a member of the bench who had heard the matter at the time when it was reserved, is patently illegal and void ab-initio. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 5, 2022

You may also like:

Benami transactions - matter was heard by one authority and the judgment was pronounced by another authority - A writ is maintainable when there is a right. In the...

Rectification u/s 154 - non reliance or consideration of binding decisions of the superior court while pronouncing an order / judgement - appeal of the assessee dismissed - AT

Prayer for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal - Dismissal of section 9 application - The NCLAT observed that the NCLT order clearly indicated the dates of hearing...

Condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the Appeals - The present is a case where Appellant cannot be blamed for not applying the certified copy of the Order dated...

Constitution of Competition Commission - coram of the commission - binding nature of final judgment, which was signed and pronounced by only three members against six...

Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the date of conclusions of its hearing - Since, in the present case, the order has been pronounced one day...

Majority order of the Tribunal - It is axiomatic that if at the time of pronouncement all the members of the Bench are not available, on account of any of them having...

Enforceability of Foreign Award - GoI can recover Petroleum due when the Corporate Debtor is already under Insolvency - once order has been pronounced u/s. 7 of the I&B...

Jurisdiction - CESTAT - Nothing is placed on record to suggest that, the single member passing the impugned was duly authorized by the President of CESTAT to hear and...

Applicability of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 - shifting the burden of proof of licit import of subject goods - the CESTAT ought to have satisfied itself with...

Quick Updates: