Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchase bills - AO was having complete ...

AO Fails to Verify Purchase Bill Authenticity u/s 69C; Unreasonable Demands on Assessee for Additional Details.

September 12, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchase bills - AO was having complete information about those parties - The ld. AO himself made any enquiry with those parties further with respect to genuineness of purchase of material by the assessee. - The only allegation of the assessing officer is that assessee has failed to show receipt of goods as well as failed to produce those parties. Furthermore, looking to the nature of the business, assessee cannot be asked to produce more details then what is generally kept by an assessee in that line of the business. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchase bills - AO was having complete ...

AO Fails to Verify Purchase Bill Authenticity u/s 69C; Unreasonable Demands on Assessee for Additional Details.

September 12, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

HC ruled in favor of revenue department, reversing lower authorities' decision to apply 12.5% estimation on bogus purchases. Assessee failed to explain source of...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - genuineness of purchases - Assessee statedly had made purchases from the three parties - Payments made through banking channels -...

Bogus purchases - addition made u/s 69C - assessee is making local purchases without any transportation bills, delivery challans etc., the possibility of the Assessee...

TPO's adjustment on equipment purchases from associated enterprise was deleted. Tribunal found assessee had produced all relevant bills for laboratory equipment...

Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

Bogus purchases u/s 69C - merely because the assessee is able to produce the purchase bills evidencing the VAT charged to the assessee, does not establish the factum of...

Onus on assessee to explain exorbitant increase in transport expenses and support with proper bills/vouchers, which assessee failed. Sample bills/vouchers not for...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - buy back of its own shares - The fact remains that the factum of extinguishment of the purchased shares by reducing the paid up capital of the...

Assessee failed to substantiate the difference between purchases shown in its Profit and Loss Account and TCS reflected in Form 26AS. Sample bills showed invoices raised...

Imposition of penalties u/s 114 (iii) and 114A on employees / manager of CHA - benami shipping bills - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly filed benami...

Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchases - Enquiries conducted by the AO prove the fact that purchases from the above parties are bogus which are not supported by necessary...

The assessee had made purchases from M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., which the Department treated as bogus and added a profit element. The assessee pointed out discrepancies...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - The assessee has only filed the copy of the ledger of the purchases from one-party. But the assessee failed to file the copies...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

Quick Updates: