Constitution of Stakeholders Consultation Committee (‘SCC’) - ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 24, 2022

Constitution of Stakeholders Consultation Committee (‘SCC’) - the nomination of the first Respondent as the representative of the Shareholders cannot be rejected by the Liquidator simply on the ground that the said nomination was not made unanimously by all the Shareholders and has further held that as the first Respondent was nominated by or i.e., the 3 out of 5 Shareholders, the question of applicability of the provisions under Regulation 31A(4) does not arise. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Constitution of Stakeholders Consultation Committee (‘SCC’) - ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 24, 2022

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

Issuance of C declaration Forms - pending government dues - this Court upheld the power of the respondent to withhold the C Form declarations, as the respondent is...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the assessee cannot be straightway rejected that such error may occur due to software problem - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it cannot be said that the surrender of income was voluntary - assessee had no intention to declare its true income - penalty confirmed - SC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The calibre and expertise of the assessee has little or nothing to do with the inadvertent error. - SC

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - penalty cannot be levied where a bonafide claim of the assessee was rejected by the tax department. - AT

Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Issues on basis of which ALP shown by the assessee has been rejected are debatable - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Quick Updates: