Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2022 Year 2022 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - denial of claim of embezzlement loss - ...

Income Tax

October 11, 2022

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - denial of claim of embezzlement loss - The fact that the cheque does not figure in the bank account of other party does not by itself prove the explanation of the assessee as wrong, as long as cheque stands reflected as issued in the bank statement of the assessee, which was not proved to be false by the Revenue. - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

  2. Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

  3. Loss due to embezzlement by an employee - loss on account of theft be treated as business loss - no interference reuired - - HC

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the section has been enacted to provide for a remedy for loss of revenue, by reason of concealment of particulars of income - penalty confirmed - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

  6. Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

  7. Stay of demand for penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - quantum appeal pending - assessee prima-facie having fair chance of win - enforcement for recovery would cause serious loss...

  8. Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act cannot be levied in a case where the assessed income is a loss – Held yes - HC

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates