Revision u/s 263 - the Ld. AR has been fair enough to concede ...

PCIT justified in setting aside assessment as AO failed to refer to TPO u/s 263 for AY 2017-18.

October 14, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - the Ld. AR has been fair enough to concede that the AO was mandatorily required to refer the same to the TPO and, therefore, we hold that the Ld. PCIT was justified in setting aside the assessment on the issue of non-reference to the TPO in Assessment Year 2017-18. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - the Ld. AR has been fair enough to concede ...

PCIT justified in setting aside assessment as AO failed to refer to TPO u/s 263 for AY 2017-18.

October 14, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT ruled against Principal CIT's revision under Section 263, finding the order procedurally flawed. The tribunal held that PCIT cannot delegate verification...

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

CBDT notifies new Income Tax Return Forms for AY 2017-18 - Circular

The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

Revision u/s 263 - another possible view of the matter - The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the PCIT, arguing that the original assessment order by the AO was...

Revision u/s 263 - Suo moto revisional proceeding initiated - The Gauhati High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the Show Cause Notice and the ex-parte Order...

Revision u/s 263 - Assessee has failed to establish that the AO has made necessary enquiries - there is no doubt about applicability of Explanation (2) to section 263(1)...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

The ITAT ruled that the assessee is entitled to set off brought forward losses from AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 against profits earned in AY 2017-18. The Tribunal clarified...

The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

Invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (PCIT), alleging non-application of mind and lack of jurisdiction. The key points are: The...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 due to discrepancies in the assessment order, including undisclosed TDS, differences in purchases...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT issued the above show cause notice u/s 263 in respect of specified domestic transactions referred to in clause (i) of section 92BA of the Act...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The Appellate Tribunal found that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified. It observed that the assessment...

Quick Updates: