Anti-competitive agreements - Dominant position of Google in ...

Google Found Dominant in India, Ordered to Stop Anti-Competitive Practices u/s 27, Must Comply in 3 Months.

October 28, 2022

Case Laws Indian Laws Commission

Anti-competitive agreements - Dominant position of Google in India - In terms of the provisions of Section 27 of the Act, the Commission hereby directs Google to cease and desist from indulging in anti-competitive practices that have been found to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act - Google, however, is allowed three months from the date of receipt of this order to implement necessary changes in its practices and/or modify the applicable agreements/ policies and to submit a compliance report to the Commission in this regard. - Commission

View Source

← Previous Next →

Anti-competitive agreements - Dominant position of Google in ...

Google Found Dominant in India, Ordered to Stop Anti-Competitive Practices u/s 27, Must Comply in 3 Months.

October 28, 2022

Case Laws Indian Laws Commission

You may also like:

Anti-competitive practices - from the sequence of events and from the evidences on the record that the conduct of the Appellant and the opposite parties is...

Abusive/Anti-competitive practices - price discrimination -there exists a prima facie case for investigation against MMT-Go and OYO for alleged violation of the...

CCI analyzed allegations of abuse of dominant position by an airport operator under Section 4 of the Competition Act. After comprehensive review, the Commission found no...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dealt with a case involving cartelization and bid-rigging in tenders for soil sample testing by the Department of...

Interest on the refund u/s 27A - the Explanation to Section 27A makes it clear that the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Appellate Tribunal are also...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Abuse of dominant position - Google has not provided the financial information as sought by the CCI vide its order dated 6.10.2021, and reiterated in its later order...

The CCI dismissed allegations of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Regarding Section 3, the...

DTAA with Slovenia - ASSISTANCE IN THE COLLECTION OF TAXES - New Article 27 w.e.f. 1.3.2017

Abuse of Dominant position - (Apple/Airtel/Vodafone) - distribution/ sales arrangement between Apple and Airtel/Vodafone - there is no anti-competitive effect of the...

Levy of penalty under Section 27(3)/27(4) of TNVAT Act - Any alleged admission before the Inspecting Authority cannot be put against the assessee because the Assessing...

The appellant provided steamer agent and cargo handling agency services, which involved segregation, internal shifting of timber logs, and sending progress reports to...

Refund claim in terms of Section 27 of the Customs Act - Rejected being time barred - Anti-dumping duty paid on PVC film - limitation prescribed under Section 27 would...

Refund claim - Period of limitation - Doctrine of merger - importer having registered a ‘Protest’ - The Tribunal held that, "the doctrine of merger" implies that the...

Anti-Competitive Agreements - Monopoly - abuse of dominant position - principal bone of contention of the appellants is that Coal India Limited, the first appellant...

Quick Updates: