Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2022 Year 2022 This

Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount ...


Assessee's Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution; Amount Below Rs. 2,00,000 Threshold u/r 20, CESTAT Rules 1982.

October 31, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount involved in the appeal - disputed amount is less than Rs.2,00,000/- - the appellant failed to appeared for hearing despite notice - the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 as also in terms of Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 being not maintainable as the disputed amount is less than the threshold limit. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

  2. Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224...

  3. Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

  4. In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

  5. The HC allowed the petition and quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of Rs. 40,00,000 deposited voluntarily by mistake. The HC held that the amount...

  6. Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

  7. Plaintiff contended defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending suit claim. Court held limitation issue raised by defendants requires further examination...

  8. Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

  10. Provisional release of detained goods - The department's insistence on a 100% bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- was deemed arbitrary and onerous, especially considering...

  11. ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal challenging leave encashment deduction under section 10(10AA). The tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s rejection based on non-submission...

  12. The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

  13. Penalty for cash loan/ transactions against primary co-operatives - Section 269SS / 269T - Relief given to Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (“PACS”) and Primary...

  14. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - Suo moto disallowance by assessee upheld, disallowance restricted to Rs. 2,00,000 for the year, following HT Media Ltd. decision....

  15. HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates