Seeking review of the order - adverse remarks against the ...

Tribunal Upholds Order Despite Patent Error; Dismisses Application Alleging Suppression of Facts in Favor of DSKL.

November 24, 2022

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

Seeking review of the order - adverse remarks against the applicant - Applicant suppressed material facts and misguided the members of CoC to achieve the desired decision in favour of DSKL. Further, this Tribunal observed that the adverse remarks and observations made in para 54 of the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 01.03.2021 are not baseless and further observed that for appreciating the materials on record and to decide the matter, such observations are necessary. - There is patent error - Application dismissed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Seeking review of the order - adverse remarks against the ...

Tribunal Upholds Order Despite Patent Error; Dismisses Application Alleging Suppression of Facts in Favor of DSKL.

November 24, 2022

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP - Financial debt or not - application dismissed by the NCLT - The definition of debt and default which is the only thing required for the purpose of...

Permission to withdraw application filed u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was denied, and the Appellant challenged the order contending error in not...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of registration application u/s 12A/12AB due to a clerical error in selecting the appropriate section in the e-filing...

The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

The Appellate Tribunal examined whether there were sufficient grounds to recall its previous order dated 02.04.2024, wherein liberty was granted by the Supreme Court to...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Dismissal of Section 9 application - pre-existing dispute - The Tribunal examined the evidence, including email correspondences, and concluded that a debtor-creditor...

The NCLAT condoned the delay in re-filing appeals but ultimately dismissed the appellant's case. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not file a recall application...

Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

Weighted deduction u/s. 35(2AB) - Any application for patent foreign country has to be filed in India as per section 7 of The Patent Act, 1970, according to patent...

Rejection of an application filed u/s 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Appellant, where the State Bank of India (SBI) had initiated proceedings u/s...

NCLAT dismissed the company appeal challenging an interim order regarding an Annual General Meeting (AGM). The Appellate Tribunal held that interlocutory orders...

HC quashed Tribunal's order regarding reopening of assessment based on alleged non-disclosure of unabsorbed investment allowance. The Tribunal erroneously concluded that...

The NCLAT dismissed a recall application, confirming that the Appellate Tribunal's power of recall is limited to exceptional circumstances as established in Union Bank...

Rectification of certain errors apparent on face of order denied in AAR ruling. AR contended AAR should have ruled on all queries. Held: No error apparent on record...

Quick Updates: