Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Best judgment assessment - email ...


Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) Invalid if Notices Sent to Outdated Email; Proper Service Required for Enforcement.

December 13, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Best judgment assessment - email notices sent to old ITP’s email address - without proper service of notices to the assessee, the assessee cannot be levied with penalty under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance of such notices. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

  2. Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

  3. Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

  4. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  5. Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

  8. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  9. ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding that the statutory notice under section 142(1) was not sent to the registered email addresses as defined in Explanation (t)...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

  12. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - AO has not specified the relevant portion of the clause (c) of the notice under Section 274 rws 271 of the Act for initiating penalty...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates