Revision u/s 263 - Scope of Explanation 2 to section 263 - the ...

PCIT's Authority Limited: Cannot Revise Every AO Order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act. Judicial Clarification Provided.

December 29, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - Scope of Explanation 2 to section 263 - the said Explanation does not give unfettered power to the PCIT to assume revisional-jurisdiction to revise every order of the AO to re-examine the issues already examined during assessment-proceeding. It is judicially interpreted in several decisions that the intention of legislature behind introduction of Explanation 2 could not have been to enable the PCIT to find fault with each and every assessment-order in unlimited terms - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Scope of Explanation 2 to section 263 - the ...

PCIT's Authority Limited: Cannot Revise Every AO Order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act. Judicial Clarification Provided.

December 29, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - income voluntarily offered before commencement of assessment proceedings - the time limit for furnishing the revised return of income u/s 139(5)...

Clarification on clubbing of investment limits of Foreign Portfolio Investors ("FPIs")

Threshold Limit of tax audit under section 44AB and section 44AD – clarification - Circular

Clarifications on the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 - Another set of clarification and FAQs

This circular revises position limits for trading members (TMs) in equity derivatives segment. Overall position limit for TMs (proprietary + client) is increased to...

Exemption u/s. 54 - outer limit for the purchase or construction of the new asset 54(2) - it can safely be gathered that the conscious, purposive and intentional...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Income from pension fund u/s 10(23AAB) - CIT(A) admitted the fresh claim - Claim of exemption when the income is taxable u/s 44 - If the assessee failed to revise its...

Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in...

Applicability of Section 56(2)(x) and the jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Jaipur-1, in revising the order u/s 263. The key points are:...

Rejection of Refund claim - Whether the service provided by the appellant to GSPHCL is service provided to a governmental authority? - The GSPHCL is a 100% owned by...

Quick Updates: