Tribunal not deciding the matter itself and remanding it to the ...

High Court Criticizes Tribunal for Avoiding Decisions on Merits, Urges Fulfillment of Judicial Duty.

February 16, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Tribunal not deciding the matter itself and remanding it to the Assessing Officer - it is noticed that the approach of the Tribunal is to abdicate its duty of deciding the matter on the merits or to retain the matter till the outcome of the pending matter before the Apex Court. Since this is not permissible, it is deemed appropriate that the Tribunal, which is otherwise required to decide the matter on merit, - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal not deciding the matter itself and remanding it to the ...

High Court Criticizes Tribunal for Avoiding Decisions on Merits, Urges Fulfillment of Judicial Duty.

February 16, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

Recovery of duty foregone - non-fulfillment of export obligation - non-installation of the capital goods and consequent non-fulfilment of post-importation condition -...

Judicial Discipline - Seeking refund of accumulated Cenvat credit - input services or not - The department had not accepted the judgement in the case of Paul Merchants...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

CESTAT dismissed the appeal regarding IGST refund claims for manually paid TR6 challans. The tribunal consistently held that exporters cannot claim refund under Section...

Violation of judicial discipline - The Additional Director of DRI and the adjudicating authority effectively said that the Tribunal was not correct. If it be their...

The case pertains to the rectification of a mistake and reopening of assessment u/s 147 versus assessment u/s 153C. The information or seized document belonging to the...

Classification of imported goods - Narrow Woven Fabric Webbing - The tribunal noted that the appellant's actions in misclassifying goods from a specific country...

HC determined the ITAT's decision to remand the matter to CIT(A) was improper when the issue was purely legal under Rule 27. Given ITAT had acknowledged the legal nature...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

In a CESTAT decision addressing customs valuation, the Tribunal ruled against re-determining import goods' value through arbitrary price truncation. The judicial finding...

The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the Mumbai Tribunal's order in M/s Pooja Marketing, which comprehensively dealt with all aspects, facts, and applicable case laws....

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding foreign tax credit for state taxes paid in the United States under Section 91, despite the existence of an India-USA...

The decisions of the Hon’ble non-jurisdictional High Court have no relevance in the present context. It is also elementary in law that the mere pendency of the appeal,...

Quick Updates: