Validity of Reopening of assessment - reason to belief - Bogus ...

Assessment Reopening u/s 147 Invalid; AO Lacked Due Diligence, Failed to Provide Supporting Facts, Addition Deleted.

June 6, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of Reopening of assessment - reason to belief - Bogus share transactions - AO, while recording the reasons, has not applied his mind and has not brought out any factual finding with regard to the impugned addition. It is also noticed that the assessee’s request with regard to the workings of the impugned addition and the statements recorded from the Broker was not shared with him by the lower authorities - the reopening u/s. 147 is not valid and accordingly, the addition made stands deleted. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Reopening of assessment - reason to belief - Bogus ...

Assessment Reopening u/s 147 Invalid; AO Lacked Due Diligence, Failed to Provide Supporting Facts, Addition Deleted.

June 6, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Change of opinion - The reopening of the assessment is nothing but a mere change of opinion on the part of AO. If the AO could not...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

The ITAT quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147, finding it invalid on two grounds. First, the reasons recorded by the AO were vague and incomplete,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In case incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons are recorded by the A.O. for reopening of the assessment and A.O. failed to verify...

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

The assessee's appeal against the Commissioner's revision order u/s 263 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO), after reopening the assessment...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

ITAT ruled the assessment order invalid due to procedural deficiencies and lack of proper jurisdiction. The AO failed to issue mandatory notice under Section 143(2)...

Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 - the reopening of assessment made by the AO on irrelevant facts and on a mere reason to suspect cannot survive. We hold that...

AO reopened assessment on basis of difference between market value and registration value of property, assuming petitioner was owner. Petitioner argued section 50C...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unexplained loan - There were no justification for the A.O. to record non-existing, incorrect and wrong facts in the reasons for...

The HC held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment beyond four years u/s 147. The reasons did not establish the assessee's failure to fully disclose...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reply to the audit objections - in fact AO applied his mind to the audit party objection and formed a clear opinion that there is no...

Quick Updates: