Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s ...

Court Rules Notice Invalid u/s 139(9); Refund Claim Correct Despite Name Change Dispute.

June 24, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s 139(9) or not - in whose name the refund should be issued? - PAN database correction would certainly indicate what was the original name and therefore, Petitioner’s name when it filed the return of income tax was the correct name as it then existed. Therefore, there can never be a defect and notice issued u/s 139(9) was not a valid notice. If AO had checked the database, he would have found answer and could have avoided issuing a notice. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s ...

Court Rules Notice Invalid u/s 139(9); Refund Claim Correct Despite Name Change Dispute.

June 24, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Claim of refund of tax paid earlier since the return was treated as Invalid by the AO - delay in rectification of return u/s 139(9) - refund cannot be allowed - HC

Invalid return - Rejection of refund - mismatch in the figures of income returned and as reported in Form 26AS - Technically speaking, the AO has not passed an order u/s...

Denial of interest on the refund claim sanctioned to the appellant - it is seen that in ordinary course of refund arising out of finalization of provisional assessment...

Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2020 - Reservation of name or change of name - Notification

HC determined that Notification No. 54/2018-Central Tax amending Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules operates prospectively from October 9, 2018, not retrospectively from October...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, addressed the admissibility of a section 9 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

The case assesses the statutory construct of IBC regarding demand notices u/s 9. A dispute arose over payment to Respondent No. 2 by the Corporate Debtor, with a notice...

The NCLAT allowed the appeal against admission of a Section 9 application, finding a clear pre-existing dispute between the parties. The Tribunal held that the corporate...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Issuing of notice u/s 148 in the wrong name - it was only a typographical error in first name of the assessee though other...

NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning operational creditor's Section 9 application under IBC. Court held that while Section 8 notice is mandatory prerequisite for filing...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Admission of section 9 application - initiation of CIRP - pre-existing disputes or not - he National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) found ample evidence of a...

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT...

Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between...

Refund of Cenvat credit - Rule 5 – Power of Additional Commissioner to adjudicate refund claim - AT

Quick Updates: