Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2023 Year 2023 This

Revision u/s 263 - validity of notice as issued by the ITO who ...


Notice u/s 263 Invalid as Issued by ITO Below PCIT Rank; No Delegation Allowed in Statute.

July 22, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - validity of notice as issued by the ITO who is below the rank of ld. PCIT - The statute never permitted in section 263 for delegation of power to the authority below for issuance of notice for initiation of proceedings. - The delegation if possible if permitted by the law. DR was unable to place any judgment against the submission of assessee. Accordingly, the notice issued U/s 263 is invalid. - AT

 

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - PCIT issued the above show cause notice u/s 263 in respect of specified domestic transactions referred to in clause (i) of section 92BA of the Act...

  2. Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. -...

  3. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  4. ITAT held that the revision proceedings under Section 263 were invalid. The PCIT failed to establish both essential conditions: the AO's order being erroneous and...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - requirement to issue show cause notice u/s 263 - denial of natural justice - We do not agree with the contention of the ld Counsel to the effect that...

  6. Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

  8. Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

  9. The assessee was allowed deduction u/s 54/54F without proper examination of relevant details and materials. The Assessing Officer (AO) framed the assessment u/s 143(3)...

  10. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  11. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows that after having made a contradictory observation on issue of lack of enquiry of cash deposit aspect for...

  12. Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act s only applicable to residents and not to Non Residents. - In the instant case also Ld. A.O...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - Unexplained cash investment u/s 69 - PCIT has no right to review the order which was subject matter of appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and we notice that the...

  14. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - Out of the three issues raised in the show cause notice u/s 263 of the Act, in two issues ld. AO has conducted complete enquiry during re-assessment...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates