Unexplained investment - the appellant failed to submit monetary ...

Appellant Fails to Prove Investment Trail, Additions Confirmed in Appeal Proceedings.

July 29, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Unexplained investment - the appellant failed to submit monetary trail of earlier years closing balance of investments to substantiate its claim that it had invested in three companies as mentioned hereinabove The status whereof remained unchanged in the appellate proceedings - Additions confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unexplained investment - the appellant failed to submit monetary ...

Appellant Fails to Prove Investment Trail, Additions Confirmed in Appeal Proceedings.

July 29, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT ruled that additions under section 69A regarding unexplained income were unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to prove that cash withdrawals were used...

Addition on account of diamond set received as gift by the appellant - The CIT(A) accepted the appellant's submission that the diamond set was indeed gifted by his late...

The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

Addition u/s 68 - CIT-A deleted the entire additions on the basis of few sample shareholders - AO has also not given the breakup of the investment made by the 10 persons...

The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal against additions made by the AO regarding an alleged unexplained investment in a Sagar Plaza flat. The Tribunal found that the...

Additions towards income earned from undisclosed investment - The addition of income earned from the investment is also solely based upon the admission by the ex-partner...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained credit - Onus to prove - share capital introduced - the assessee failed to explain the sources of investment of cash of Rs. 10 lacs each by...

Addition on account of Unexplained paintings - Source of Investment made in the painting - the revenue had failed to place on record any ‘material’ which would...

Deemed Loss - Diminution in the value of investment in two unlisted companies - Loss in the value of investment will arise only when such shares are sold by the...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

Addition u/s 40(A)(3) - payment was made otherwise then by account payee cheque - assessee failed to prove - addition confirmed - HC

Dishonor of Cheque - defendant failed to prove that plaintiff falls within the definition of ‘money-lender’ under the Act and also failed to prove that various recovery...

‘Consulting Engineering Services' - it is onus on the department to prove that the appellant has received this amount as “Consulting Engineering Firm” which the...

Unaccounted credit in the savings bank account - unexplained investment u/s 69 - Though the learned counsel for the appellant raised a plea that the appellant was...

Quick Updates: